Message82934
| Author |
benjamin.peterson |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, ggenellina, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2009年02月28日.18:19:01 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.157687e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1afaf6160902281019m1a6a92bewad0e0c6e2fc07e9@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1235844770.25.0.583479216482.issue3618@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
2009年2月28日 Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> I don't know. The RLock is a lot slower than the normal non-recursive
> variation, on the other hand I'm not sure we care about performance of
> the Python version that much. Opinions welcome.
I'm +0. The deadlock will only affect people specifically messing with
the Python io implementation. It's low priority, so maybe we should
just do it when RLock is rewritten in C. |
|