Message82689
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
blaisorblade, collinwinter, jcea, jyasskin, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date |
2009年02月25日.01:52:33 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.4343637e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1235526807.7505.45.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<1235523083.87.0.816812320889.issue4715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Le mercredi 25 février 2009 à 00:51 +0000, Jeffrey Yasskin a écrit :
> I've updated Antoine's patch to incorporate my comments. This interacts
> with issue 2459, but I haven't yet looked at its patch to figure out
> how. As a first cut, I'll propose committing this patch, backporting it
> to trunk, syncing it into the issue 2459 patch, and then committing that
> patch. Let me know if that's crazy.
Doesn't sound crazier than doing it in another order :-))
There'll be a bit of work to reconcile both patches anyway (and also to
adapt the 2459 in order to apply cleanly against current trunk).
2459 defines its own JUMP_ABS_IF_TRUE / JUMP_ABS_IF_FALSE (which are the
same as this patch's POP_JUMP_IF_TRUE / POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE), but it also
keeps the old relative non-popping conditional jumps, which as this
issue shows is sub-optimal.
Thank you for taking this, Jeffrey, my own priority right now being the
io-c branch. |
|