Message82556
| Author |
collinwinter |
| Recipients |
collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jyasskin, lauromoura, nnorwitz, phsilva, pitrou, rhettinger, tzot |
| Date |
2009年02月21日.00:30:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.2818159e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<43aa6ff70902201630k321da513xe51cd7c0f5ff8d42@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<43aa6ff70902131523o12b76651x754b86939123db97@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Collin Winter <collinw@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>> Before committing I want to know what to do with the new jump opcodes,
>> with respect to the alternative proposal I've made in #4715.
>> Ideally, I should fold the #4715 patch back into the present patch,
>> since I think the #4715 approach is more thought out.
>
> That sounds good, especially since Jeffrey and I have already reviewed #4715.
If you don't have the bandwidth to integrate 4715 into this patch, I
can do that, if you want.
Collin |
|