Message82247
| Author |
andybuckley |
| Recipients |
andybuckley, doko, nas, nascheme, rpetrov |
| Date |
2009年02月16日.16:19:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.210527e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1234801246.39.0.0878978539545.issue4151@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm having trouble with this as well :( It's pretty much a blocker for
integrating distutils-based extension builds with an autotools library
build, because the "make distcheck" target explicitly does the build in
a subtree of the source directory, and write-protects the srcdir during
the build.
Effectively the source is referred to in my setup.py as living in
"../../pyext", which translates into distutils attempting to build the
extension in "build/temp.linux-i686-2.5/../../pyext/", which is the
write-protected source dir. This would work okay if the directory path
to the source file were ignored when constructing the output path: would
the proposed patch(es) fix this? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年02月16日 16:20:46 | andybuckley | set | recipients:
+ andybuckley, nascheme, doko, nas, rpetrov |
| 2009年02月16日 16:20:46 | andybuckley | set | messageid: <1234801246.39.0.0878978539545.issue4151@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年02月16日 16:19:37 | andybuckley | link | issue4151 messages |
| 2009年02月16日 16:19:36 | andybuckley | create |
|