Message81633
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
gumtree, mark.dickinson |
| Date |
2009年02月11日.08:56:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.0543537e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1234342615.23.0.310819696909.issue5211@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Comment by gumtree copied from issue3734 discussion:
> While Mark Dickinson's patch fixes the documentation, it does not
offer
> a solution to the original problem, which was rooted in a need to
> provide special behaviour based on the numeric types. I made the
> original posting because I hoped that this problem could be resolved.
gumtree, would you be interested in working on a patch for this feature-
request? As mentioned above, the necessary changes are already present
in 3.x, so all that's entailed is figuring out which bits of the
Object/complexobject.c in the py3k source need to be transferred to the
trunk, and making sure that everything's properly tested.
Alternatively, could you explain in a little more detail why this change
is important to you? Subclassing complex doesn't seem like a very
common thing to want to do, so I'm curious about your use case. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年02月11日 08:56:55 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, gumtree |
| 2009年02月11日 08:56:55 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1234342615.23.0.310819696909.issue5211@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年02月11日 08:56:53 | mark.dickinson | link | issue5211 messages |
| 2009年02月11日 08:56:52 | mark.dickinson | create |
|