Message81146
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, shields |
| Date |
2009年02月04日.18:02:12 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0011348372 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1233770533.77.0.503229956109.issue3959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Probably it has already been said, but for the record: is ipaddr's
current API ok for other libraries (mainly: netaddr) to build upon it
and provide compatible extensions or replacements, or would netaddr
become an incompatible alternative to the stdlib-provided ipaddr? The
latter would be a shame. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年02月04日 18:02:14 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, gvanrossum, loewis, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, pnasrat, oubiwann |
| 2009年02月04日 18:02:13 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1233770533.77.0.503229956109.issue3959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年02月04日 18:02:12 | pitrou | link | issue3959 messages |
| 2009年02月04日 18:02:12 | pitrou | create |
|