Message81142
| Author |
tarek |
| Recipients |
akitada, jbelmonte, tarek |
| Date |
2009年02月04日.16:26:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0026350236 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1233764798.72.0.882325079473.issue962772@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
the Author metadata uses the maintainer field *or* the author field if
the maintainer is not provided.
What would be the rational to add a new maintainer field in the PKG-INFO ?
In the first place, I am wondering what is the rational, today, to use
the maintainer argument at all.
John, can you detail this ? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年02月04日 16:26:38 | tarek | set | recipients:
+ tarek, jbelmonte, akitada |
| 2009年02月04日 16:26:38 | tarek | set | messageid: <1233764798.72.0.882325079473.issue962772@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年02月04日 16:26:37 | tarek | link | issue962772 messages |
| 2009年02月04日 16:26:36 | tarek | create |
|