Message81141
| Author |
pmoody |
| Recipients |
Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, drkjam, exarkun, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, shields |
| Date |
2009年02月04日.16:25:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.4630663e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<8517e9350902040825p7688703ycb9430363a3f16aa@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<498772F9.109@v.loewis.de> |
| Content |
> I could live with such a choice if the netaddr authors agree that it
> is the right choice (them being experts themselves in the domain).
> I don't want to be accused of drkjam's accusation of fast-tracking
> code just because it comes from Google (which would be a false
> accusation regardless, but there is no reason to make some Python
> users unhappy because they feel they are subject to political games).
in light of david's email, would you agree that the bar for buy-in has
been met or should I now start writing a PEP and preparing offerings
for the BDFL?
Cheers,
/peter |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年02月04日 16:25:48 | pmoody | set | recipients:
+ pmoody, gvanrossum, loewis, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pnasrat, drkjam, oubiwann |
| 2009年02月04日 16:25:47 | pmoody | link | issue3959 messages |
| 2009年02月04日 16:25:46 | pmoody | create |
|