Message81122
| Author |
damien |
| Recipients |
ajaksu2, akuchling, damien, exarkun, loewis, pboddie, vdupras |
| Date |
2009年02月04日.01:06:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.1611914e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1233709573.36.0.0388264885616.issue2124@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
On Feb 3, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> This is DOM parsing, not SAX parsing.
1) The title of this ticket begins with "xml.sax and xml.dom...".
2) I am creating a SAX parser and passing it to xml.dom, which uses it.
> So break layers of abstraction, then. Or else, use dom.expatbuilder,
> and ignore SAX/pulldom for DOM parsing.
Is that really the answer?
Read the source code to xml.dom.*, and write hacks based on what I find
there? Note also that xml.dom.expatbuilder does not appear to be an
external API--there is no mention of it in the documentation for
xml.dom.*.
> This tracker is really not the place to ask questions; use python-list
> for that.
That was a rhetorical question.
The answer is, as best I can tell, "You can't do that." |
|