Message81011
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, drkjam, exarkun, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, shields |
| Date |
2009年02月02日.22:26:02 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.4790556e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<498772F9.109@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1233612881.5.0.966405928675.issue3959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> As such, and given the recent work made to ipaddr to make it
> stdlib-friendly, my vote would be to include ipaddr in Python while
> netaddr can continue growing, providing its user base with diverse
> functionality while hopefully taking advantage of ipaddr in the Python
> stdlib as much as is practical and useful.
I could live with such a choice if the netaddr authors agree that it
is the right choice (them being experts themselves in the domain).
I don't want to be accused of drkjam's accusation of fast-tracking
code just because it comes from Google (which would be a false
accusation regardless, but there is no reason to make some Python
users unhappy because they feel they are subject to political games). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年02月02日 22:26:04 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, gvanrossum, exarkun, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, pnasrat, drkjam, oubiwann |
| 2009年02月02日 22:26:03 | loewis | link | issue3959 messages |
| 2009年02月02日 22:26:02 | loewis | create |
|