Message80662
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
loewis, mhammond |
| Date |
2009年01月27日.17:47:01 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.8176797e-11 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<497F4893.5000909@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1233050257.64.0.716100380567.issue5076@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Good question! I'm not really aware of the complexities involved in
> merging between the various branches, but given the fairly trivial
> nature of the patch I figured there were potential advantages in both
> identical source and stubs. I'm happy to work the patch into either
> #ifdef based (ie, identical source, different stubs), or "unconditional"
> (both source and stubs different) if you prefer - and if so, which of
> those 2 do you prefer?
It's still possible to merge changes reasonably even if the "target"
(i.e. py3k) differs slightly from the source. Therefore, I think the 3k
version should unconditionally only support python3x.dlls. IOW, let
the sources diverge (for sake of simplicity of each individual source). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年01月27日 17:47:02 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, mhammond |
| 2009年01月27日 17:47:01 | loewis | link | issue5076 messages |
| 2009年01月27日 17:47:01 | loewis | create |
|