Message80201
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, kawai, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2009年01月19日.18:17:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.2633744e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1232389079.69.0.0309001274653.issue4996@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I don't understand the motivation of having two different methods
for "raw" streams: read1() and read(). I would prefer to have only a
method read() (because "read" is the most common name, whereas read1()
is only used on Python3), but read() will have to follow the read1()
rule: at most one syscall. If someone requires a read() method with
the "one syscall" rule, he can use a raw stream. If you don't care,
use high level classes (TextIOWrapper, BufferedReader, etc.).
_fileio._FileIO.read() and _socket.socket.recv_into() already respect
the syscall rule.
Since BytesIO and StringIO don't use kernel object, the syscall rule
is meaningles.
Note: socket.SocketIO() implements RawIOBase but it has no read() nor
write() methods ;-) That's maybe why IOBase has no read()/write()
method. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年01月19日 18:17:59 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, gvanrossum, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, kawai |
| 2009年01月19日 18:17:59 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1232389079.69.0.0309001274653.issue4996@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年01月19日 18:17:58 | vstinner | link | issue4996 messages |
| 2009年01月19日 18:17:58 | vstinner | create |
|