Message79794
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
collinwinter, jyasskin, pitrou |
| Date |
2009年01月13日.23:25:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.023493685 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1231889146.7109.6.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to |
<1231888813.58.0.227500613556.issue4715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Hello,
> I've backported condbranches-plus.patch to trunk, and I'm getting these
> results:
Thanks!
> PyBench: 1.84-2.21% faster
> 2to3: 3.83% faster
> Spitfire: 6.13-6.23% faster
What is Spitfire?
> I've haven't tested condbranches.patch vs condbranches-plus.patch; what
> difference are you seeing, Antoine?
condbranches.patch is the earlier version (without POP_OR_JUMP and
JUMP_OR_POP), it can be ignored.
> This patch mostly looks good, though you still need to change Doc/
> library/dis.rst and the pure-Python compiler package.
Well, the pure-Python compiler package doesn't exist in py3k, for which
I've initially made the patch.
(and its state in 2.x is very sorry...) |
|