Message78988
| Author |
oubiwann |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, drkjam, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, shields |
| Date |
2009年01月03日.18:46:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.002728232 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1231008411.02.0.941743663734.issue3959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
>> As for shutting down any project that is chosen, does such an action
not
>> leave older Python versions out in the cold? Shouldn't the project
>> remain open to support Python versions < 2.7, with a highly visible
note
>> that the code is included in 2.7/3.1+?
>
> Of course - hence I said "eventually". The project could continue to
> maintain the external version as long as they please, provided it
> doesn't diverge from the in-core version (unless it is the in-core
> version itself that diverges). What I don't want to see happen is that
> the community recommends at some point to ignore the outdated crappy
> version in the core, and replace it with the more-powerful bug-fixed
> version available separately. This has happened in the past, so I'm
> extremely cautious here.
Fantastic! Thanks for the clarification.
David, in the event of netaddr's complete or partial inclusion, are you
+1 with this and the maintenance of an ip/net library in Python?
Guido, what is your preference regarding feature set/size for an ip/net
library in Python? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年01月03日 18:46:51 | oubiwann | set | recipients:
+ oubiwann, gvanrossum, loewis, exarkun, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, drkjam |
| 2009年01月03日 18:46:51 | oubiwann | set | messageid: <1231008411.02.0.941743663734.issue3959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年01月03日 18:46:49 | oubiwann | link | issue3959 messages |
| 2009年01月03日 18:46:49 | oubiwann | create |
|