Message78444
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
mrts, pitrou |
| Date |
2008年12月29日.10:05:04 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0051686205 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1230545107.10188.1.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to |
<1230540365.94.0.963262339481.issue4489@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> A blunt, ineffective solution would be to walk the tree before removing
> it and recording path : inode pairs in a dict on first pass and then
> checking that the inodes have not changed during removal on second pass.
There's no way to do the "check inode then remove" sequence atomically. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年12月29日 10:05:05 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, mrts |
| 2008年12月29日 10:05:04 | pitrou | link | issue4489 messages |
| 2008年12月29日 10:05:04 | pitrou | create |
|