Message76717
| Author |
lcatucci |
| Recipients |
giampaolo.rodola, lcatucci, vstinner |
| Date |
2008年12月01日.23:50:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.9151934e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1228175436.27.0.454493262242.issue4473@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I understand the need to keep things simple, but this time the split
seemed a bit overkill. If needed, I'll redo the patch into a small
series. Thinking of it... I was unsure if it really made sense to split
out smtp/pop/imap patches instead of sending them all at once... :-)
As for the shutdown before close, it's needed to let the server know
we are leaving, instead of waiting until socket timeout. This is the
reason I need to keep the reference to the wrapped socket.
You don't usually configure maildrop servers to limit the number/rate of
connects as you do on smtp servers; still, you could get into problems
with stateful forewalls or the like. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年12月01日 23:50:36 | lcatucci | set | recipients:
+ lcatucci, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola |
| 2008年12月01日 23:50:36 | lcatucci | set | messageid: <1228175436.27.0.454493262242.issue4473@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年12月01日 23:50:35 | lcatucci | link | issue4473 messages |
| 2008年12月01日 23:50:35 | lcatucci | create |
|