homepage

The new patch looks fine to me. It applies and compiles without
warnings and the changes are now reflected in the docs. I guess
someone would need to write a NEWS entry because it is a public API
change, but otherwise I would say it should be applied.
"[U]nless 'C' has adopted overloading while I wasn't looking ... it's
hard to imagine what kind of problems you could introduce in `C' code
by changing char* to char const* that wouldn't be caught at
compile-time." (Dave Abrahams in C++-sig)
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cplusplus-sig/2005-December/009562.html
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Sebastian Ramacher
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
>> * Same for PySys_SetArgv(int, char **)
>
> That one is non-trivial and requires some rewriting of PySys_SetArgv.
> And I didn't have the time to look into it any further.
>
I agree and I only tossed this one in to check if you are aware of the
char ** issues. I believe it was agreed at some point that changing
char ** to const char ** is not a good idea (see revision 42596
reverting such change), but I could not find a clear explanation of
the associated problems.
In any case, +1 from me in favor of applying this patch and I will try
to add Jeremy Hylton to the "nosy" list since he is the developer who
made similar API changes in r41638 .