Message75428
| Author |
alexandre.vassalotti |
| Recipients |
alexandre.vassalotti, amaury.forgeotdarc, ocean-city |
| Date |
2008年10月31日.20:47:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00025683347 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1225486052.47.0.992525087571.issue4176@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hirokazu Yamamoto wrote
> Hmm, but python document says,
> (http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#typeiter)
>
> >The iterator objects themselves are required to support the
> >following two methods, which together form the iterator protocol:
>
> Is this false information?
Oh, you are right. I got confused by looking at the implementation of
PyIter_Check(), which only verifies that tp_next is not NULL. Anyway,
_batch_appends() and _batch_setitems() in pickle.py calls iter() on the
iterators; so, the iterators must provide __iter__ too.
Personally, I wouldn't bother about checking for __iter__ to avoid
adding a new method to Pickler and also to save a few hasattr() calls.
But I have to admit, it is really just nitpicking at this point. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年10月31日 20:47:32 | alexandre.vassalotti | set | recipients:
+ alexandre.vassalotti, amaury.forgeotdarc, ocean-city |
| 2008年10月31日 20:47:32 | alexandre.vassalotti | set | messageid: <1225486052.47.0.992525087571.issue4176@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年10月31日 20:47:31 | alexandre.vassalotti | link | issue4176 messages |
| 2008年10月31日 20:47:30 | alexandre.vassalotti | create |
|