Message74842
| Author |
jared.jennings |
| Recipients |
jared.jennings, loewis, theller |
| Date |
2008年10月16日.18:29:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.001984252 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1224181785.66.0.165472132553.issue4130@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
According to §7.1.3 of the C99 standard, the name __int128_t is reserved
for implementation-specific use because it starts with an underscore. So
if gcc defines this type and icc does not, that is not a bug in icc; and
if Python uses this type, it will only certainly build using gcc. I
doubt such a dependency was intended, because it is not documented, and
no error was thrown when the autoconf script detected that a compiler
other than GCC was being used.
C99 standard: http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1124.pdf
Exact-width integer types (e.g. int64_t) are documented in §7.18.1.1 of
the above. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年10月16日 18:29:45 | jared.jennings | set | recipients:
+ jared.jennings, loewis, theller |
| 2008年10月16日 18:29:45 | jared.jennings | set | messageid: <1224181785.66.0.165472132553.issue4130@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年10月16日 18:29:44 | jared.jennings | link | issue4130 messages |
| 2008年10月16日 18:29:43 | jared.jennings | create |
|