Message74749
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
fredrikj, loewis, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date |
2008年10月14日.15:07:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.8299843e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1223996843.21.0.206863276162.issue3439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Accidentally removed the following message from Victor Stinner;
apologies. (Time to turn off tap-to-click on my trackpad, methinks.)
> See also issue #3724 which proposes to support long integers for
> math.log2().
One other note: in Fredrik's patch there's commented out code for a
numbits *property* (rather than a method). Is there any good reason to
make this a property? I don't have a good feeling for when something
should be a method and when it should be a property, but in this case
I'd be inclined to leave numbits as a method.
Are there general guidelines for making things properties? |
|