Message73914
| Author |
nedds |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, collinwinter, nedds |
| Date |
2008年09月27日.02:24:13 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.0737103e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1222482254.99.0.275762814977.issue3358@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
What do you think would be the best way to implement a test for this? To
test it, I ran it on a known file that caused the old recursive method
to fail, but I don't know if it makes sense to include that with the
tests. I could always write a test to verify that the iterative element
works, but as for testing the transition from recursive to iterative
when the recursion limit is exceeded, do you think that is something I
should do, and is there a better way than simply including the file that
I know causes the recursion limit to be exceeded? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年09月27日 02:24:15 | nedds | set | recipients:
+ nedds, collinwinter, benjamin.peterson |
| 2008年09月27日 02:24:14 | nedds | set | messageid: <1222482254.99.0.275762814977.issue3358@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年09月27日 02:24:14 | nedds | link | issue3358 messages |
| 2008年09月27日 02:24:13 | nedds | create |
|