Message73885
| Author |
ocean-city |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, ghaering, jlt63, ocean-city, rpetrov, tan2, vitalyy2000 |
| Date |
2008年09月26日.20:32:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
8.174136e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1222461162.58.0.41274257572.issue1706863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
>extra changes that has to go in a
>specific compiler class. As example platform can be any but compiler
>gcc(mingw) that produce executables for windows host platform.
You are right. It should be. My patch is just one choice when switching
back to CygwinCCompiler is difficult. (Anyway I don't understand well
why CygwinCCompiler was abandoned)
>it would be better to put Cygwin specific behavior
>in CygwinCCompiler, I think the changes would have be more invasive if
>you did.
Agreed. |
|