Message73440
| Author |
djmdjm |
| Recipients |
aimacintyre, djmdjm, jnoller |
| Date |
2008年09月19日.20:20:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0004823362 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<alpine.BSO.1.10.0809200617000.3881@fuyu.mindrot.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<1220487838.93.0.477905681389.issue3770@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
So the bug is actually in the multiprocessing module rather than the
unittest. If HAVE_SEM_OPEN is not defined then SemLock is never
built into _multiprocessing.so, but multiprocessing/syncronize.py
unconditionally depends on its presence.
I guess _multiprocessing could always define a dummy SemLock or
synchronize.py could check before it depends on it.
(it would be great to see this fixed for 2.6)
-d |
|