Message73250
| Author |
schuppenies |
| Recipients |
loewis, schuppenies |
| Date |
2008年09月15日.08:12:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.4299155e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1221466321.78.0.258022569645.issue3690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> What's the actual difference that this change makes?
It would provide more accurate results, even in the light of being not
perfect.
> [..] each small_int takes a complete PyLongObject. If that was also
> considered in long_sizeof, the computation would happen to be
> completely correct for bool also.
So how should this bug report be handled? Provide a patch to handle
getsizeof correctly for small_ints? 'wont fix' because there are issues
anyway? I would prefer the former and try to come up with a patch if you
think it is worthwhile. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年09月15日 08:12:01 | schuppenies | set | recipients:
+ schuppenies, loewis |
| 2008年09月15日 08:12:01 | schuppenies | set | messageid: <1221466321.78.0.258022569645.issue3690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年09月15日 08:12:01 | schuppenies | link | issue3690 messages |
| 2008年09月15日 08:12:00 | schuppenies | create |
|