Message72551
| Author |
benjamin.peterson |
| Recipients |
Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, jnoller, mikemccand, pitrou, tzot |
| Date |
2008年09月04日.23:09:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.8281766e-11 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1afaf6160809041609h36c3fb92q7c97f630ef2bfa9c@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1220569699.08.0.641698428915.issue874900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> Benjamin, if you don't change the test, the deadlock problem is still
> solved, it's just that the third test fails because the subprocess
> stdout is empty instead of containing the desired value. It is *not*
> because the subprocess doesn't print anything (if you launch an
> equivalent program on the command line, everything is printed), rather
> it seems that subprocess doesn't get what is printed from the child
> process of the subprocess.
Ah! My apologies for the giant misunderstanding. |
|