Message71804
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, mhammond, pitrou |
| Date |
2008年08月23日.09:18:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.4188085e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1219483124.5822.5.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<1219454815.13.0.0618444732933.issue3640@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Le samedi 23 août 2008 à 01:26 +0000, Mark Hammond a écrit :
> cpickle.patch does make test_cpickle pass for me. FWIW,
> find_recursionlimit.py now causes a segfault on 32 and 64bit Windows
> (the comments imply a MemoryError is expected there), and the 32bit
> version dies at a depth of 5900, while the 64bit version dies at 3800
> (both doing an 'add') - so it does seem there is still a discrepancy -
> but not one we need to care about now.
Well, the discrepancy is expected, since pointers are bigger in 64-bit
mode than in 32-bit mode, and most function calls inside the interpreter
involve pushing a bunch of PyObject pointers on the stack. |
|