Message71733
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
esrever_otua, facundobatista, jcea, loewis, pitrou |
| Date |
2008年08月22日.09:23:45 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00065790204 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1219397053.48ae85bd6e650@imp.free.fr> |
| In-reply-to |
<1219378689.43.0.0871272095656.issue3338@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Well, it's definitely a bug, or inconsistency, if you like, between
> cPickle and pickle.
There is clearly a problem with cPickle stack consumption and a new bug has been
opened for this in #3640.
What I don't agree with is your argument that pickle and cPickle should have the
same recursion limits - it's just "foolish consistency" to ask for identical
behaviour on such a low-level and implementation-dependent issue. |
|