Message71389
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
anthonybaxter, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jafo, janixia, jhylton, jyasskin, kevinwatters, loewis, pitrou, tim.peters, trent |
| Date |
2008年08月18日.21:52:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.3771184e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1219096368.43.0.337365923993.issue815646@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I know this is long closed, but no one on the nosy list happens to have
> this fix backported to 2.5, do they? :)
I think that at the time no one was sure the patch was 100% harmless. It
also subtly changes the behaviour of close() when called while another
IO operation is in progress in another thread, which is arguably a bug
fix but can still raise an exception it wouldn't have raised in 2.5.
So all in all I'm not sure this should be backported, although it would
probably be an improvement in most cases. I'll let someone else take the
decision. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年08月18日 21:52:48 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, tim.peters, loewis, jhylton, anthonybaxter, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jafo, janixia, christian.heimes, jyasskin, kevinwatters, trent |
| 2008年08月18日 21:52:48 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1219096368.43.0.337365923993.issue815646@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年08月18日 21:52:47 | pitrou | link | issue815646 messages |
| 2008年08月18日 21:52:47 | pitrou | create |
|