Message71370
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
donmez, jnoller, mark.dickinson, pitrou |
| Date |
2008年08月18日.19:50:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.268517e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1219089032.5624.18.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<1219088543.86.0.0652188855417.issue3578@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Le lundi 18 août 2008 à 19:42 +0000, Ismail Donmez a écrit :
> Ismail Donmez <ismail@namtrac.org> added the comment:
>
> Ah cool, we might be at the end of multiprocessing problems then I guess
> :-)
Well, not really, it should be diagnosed why the dictionary mutates in
the first place. This dictionary is apparently processed in a child
process just after a fork() occurred, so logically there shouldn't be
several threads running.
Unless processing the dictionary itself can create some new threads? |
|