Message70999
| Author |
jedsmith |
| Recipients |
barry, benjamin.peterson, jedsmith, lemburg |
| Date |
2008年08月11日.01:58:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0010512988 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1218419896.76.0.559332499079.issue3499@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
This happened in my fresh unpack of the 3.0b2 tarball, as well.
Touching merely Include/Python-ast.h satisfied the dependency, and I did
not have to touch Python-ast.c. Is the particular grammar-rebuild rule
needed for production tarballs anyway? I can't think the majority of
people downloading the package want to start hacking the grammar right away. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年08月11日 01:58:17 | jedsmith | set | recipients:
+ jedsmith, lemburg, barry, benjamin.peterson |
| 2008年08月11日 01:58:16 | jedsmith | set | messageid: <1218419896.76.0.559332499079.issue3499@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年08月11日 01:58:15 | jedsmith | link | issue3499 messages |
| 2008年08月11日 01:58:15 | jedsmith | create |
|