Message70981
| Author |
mgiuca |
| Recipients |
georg.brandl, loewis, mgiuca, orsenthil |
| Date |
2008年08月10日.12:45:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.006758514 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1218372315.12.0.197634675498.issue3532@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
So I assumed.
In that case, why is there a "fromhex"? (Was that put in there before
the notion of transform/untransform?) As I've been saying, it's weird to
have a fromhex but not a tohex.
Anyway, assuming we go to 3.1 and add transform/untransform, I suppose
fromhex will remain for backwards, and tohex will not be needed. So I
guess this issue is closed. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年08月10日 12:45:15 | mgiuca | set | recipients:
+ mgiuca, loewis, georg.brandl, orsenthil |
| 2008年08月10日 12:45:15 | mgiuca | set | messageid: <1218372315.12.0.197634675498.issue3532@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年08月10日 12:45:14 | mgiuca | link | issue3532 messages |
| 2008年08月10日 12:45:14 | mgiuca | create |
|