Message70805
| Author |
brett.cannon |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, gvanrossum, pitrou |
| Date |
2008年08月06日.21:28:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0024859083 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<bbaeab100808061428m223526deuadba6529fdbfdd39@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1218053557.26.0.142168657254.issue3506@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> added the comment:
>
>> Well, if it can't replace buffer() then the warning needs to change to
>> just flat-out state that buffer() is gone and not suggest any
>> replacement.
>
> +1. buffer() stinks. memoryview() rules. They don't hvae the same use
> cases.
>
That settles that then.
> Is there truly nobody else who understands PEP 3118 well enough?
Not me. |
|