Message70555
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, benjamin.peterson, donmez, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo, loewis, pitrou, teoliphant |
| Date |
2008年08月01日.14:29:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.976868e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1217600948.6.0.899200568172.issue3139@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Amaury, I think the issue of thread-safety of the io library should be
decoupled from this issue. I don't think it is release-critical that the
io library is thread-safe (and even if it is release-critical, the
problem should be tracked in a different issue, as it requires a
completely independent patch).
The original issue (bytearrays are not thread-safe) will not be
completely resolved (for a certain definition of "thread-safe"): it will
always be possible that one thread observes a locked byte object - this
is by design of the buffer interface, and it is a good design. |
|