Message70509
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, pitrou |
| Date |
2008年07月31日.14:36:15 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.317915e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1217514969.4891cdd9403bb@imp.free.fr> |
| In-reply-to |
<1217514129.14.0.722344092021.issue3476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Selon Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> It seems that as with the quadratic binary buffered reading, the best
> solution is the list of bytes which should be especially helped by your
> bytes joining optimization.
I don't really know. The logic is quite different (and harder to get right) than
in BufferedReader. I might try to write a list-of-bytes version and do some
timings, but it's not trivial... I should first compare against the current
version.
Also, an advantage of using a fixed-size bytearray is that it more closely
mimicks what will have to be written for an efficient C implementation. |
|