Message70347
| Author |
reiko |
| Recipients |
jjcogliati, lisanke, reiko, roudkerk |
| Date |
2008年07月28日.13:03:31 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.028961282 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1217250215.83.0.395397705376.issue2475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I have also run into this problem. If you only use p.poll() and never
p.wait(), returncode will always remain None.
roudkerk's workaround doesn't seem to work with the new Popen objects,
at least in python 2.4. ("unexpected keyword argument '_deadstate'")
Does anyone have a workaround for subprocess.Popen? Do I have to switch
to the deprecated popen function(s)? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008年07月28日 13:03:36 | reiko | set | recipients:
+ reiko, roudkerk, jjcogliati, lisanke |
| 2008年07月28日 13:03:35 | reiko | set | messageid: <1217250215.83.0.395397705376.issue2475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年07月28日 13:03:34 | reiko | link | issue2475 messages |
| 2008年07月28日 13:03:31 | reiko | create |
|