This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | gregory.p.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, gregory.p.smith, jnoller, mikemccand, pitrou, tzot |
| Date | 2008年07月17日.03:21:32 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.4887479e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1216264894.18.0.823244011574.issue874900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I added a Misc/NEWS note for this in r65057. This is a good candidate for backporting to release25-maint. To answer Antoine Pitrou's question about using the old ident vs the new _get_ident(). I don't know if the forked process will have the same thread id. I expect so. If not, the code as recently committed will die on an assertion failure because current_thread() is simply an _active[_get_ident()] dict lookup that returns a DummyThread instance if the lookup fails. As for Windows, Windows doesn't support os.fork and I don't see any calls to PyOS_AfterFork outside of the Modules/posixmodule.c. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年07月17日 03:21:34 | gregory.p.smith | set | spambayes_score: 1.48875e-05 -> 1.4887479e-05 recipients: + gregory.p.smith, mikemccand, tzot, amaury.forgeotdarc, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, jnoller |
| 2008年07月17日 03:21:34 | gregory.p.smith | set | spambayes_score: 1.48875e-05 -> 1.48875e-05 messageid: <1216264894.18.0.823244011574.issue874900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年07月17日 03:21:33 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue874900 messages |
| 2008年07月17日 03:21:32 | gregory.p.smith | create | |