Message69768
| Author |
ThomasH |
| Recipients |
ThomasH, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl |
| Date |
2008年07月16日.08:29:19 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0077018295 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<de6ef73d0807160129h119780ecucbc5c49df33f45fe@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1216172643.03.0.175491515468.issue3324@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Thank you for both of your feedback. I was sure that there is a
release and deployment process in place for the docs. But if the
process doesn't allow links to be fixed on a web page, there is
probably something wrong with it. It's hard to believe you would leave
such a trivial thing unfixed, accepting hundreds or thousands of
people running into a dead end. Don't you run a link checker on the
online version? Does anybody check the web server logs for misses?
It's also hard to understand why you would treat a (flexible) online
presentation like (inflexible) released software.
At the very least, could you fix the existing link
(http://www.python.org/doc/devel/lib/module-site.html), which is
seemingly a development URL, to redirect to the correct page?! Or does
this also interfer with policies and procedures?!
"Essence over ceremony" (after Neil Ford)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Georg Brandl <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> added the comment:
>
> In addition to what Benjamin said, the Python docs are released together
> with the source, so even if the issue was corrected in the 2.5 docs now,
> the correction would not show up until 2.5.3 is released, which is not
> even planned before 2.6.
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3324>
> _______________________________________
> |
|