This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | esrever_otua |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, esrever_otua |
| Date | 2008年07月16日.04:18:31 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.09534498 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1216181912.22.0.137428442564.issue3373@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hmmm, I'm not certain I agree; on 2.4/2.5 doing rec(999) hits the recursion limit, as expected (makes sense that there would be an item or two on the stack prior to the immediate call to rec() ). This looks more like the interpreter is adding 4x the number of items to the stack during the construction of the nested object, which seems pretty surprising/broken... |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年07月16日 04:18:32 | esrever_otua | set | spambayes_score: 0.095345 -> 0.09534498 recipients: + esrever_otua, brett.cannon |
| 2008年07月16日 04:18:32 | esrever_otua | set | spambayes_score: 0.095345 -> 0.095345 messageid: <1216181912.22.0.137428442564.issue3373@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年07月16日 04:18:31 | esrever_otua | link | issue3373 messages |
| 2008年07月16日 04:18:31 | esrever_otua | create | |