Message69631
| Author |
brett.cannon |
| Recipients |
alexandre.vassalotti, barry, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, georg.brandl |
| Date |
2008年07月13日.23:32:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.011132027 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<bbaeab100807131632n1a003d57i29e59f0a9e448ceb@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1215990282.58.0.908566682935.issue2874@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Brett Cannon <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> added the comment:
>
> Another option is to eliminate the use of PyStructSequence and handle
> the creation of a named tuple and a class with the methods in os.py.
> Then stat() can just return a tuple and the Python code can create the
> instances from that.
>
Although I noticed that what fields are available are affected by
compile-time info, so that might not be the best solution. |
|