This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | jjlee |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BitTorment, facundobatista, frispete, jjlee, orsenthil |
| Date | 2008年07月10日.22:35:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00045492136 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1215729316.71.0.157184400698.issue2275@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
* The patch looks like it will break code that uses .header_items(), which is not acceptable. * The patch to the docs seems to muddy the waters even further (than the current slightly murky state) about whether and why .headers is to be preferred over the methods, or vice-versa. I think .headers should remain undocumented, for the reason stated by the doctest that failed with Hans-Peter's original patch. The best course of action is debatable, but the patch is a regression in this respect, so should not be committed as-is. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年07月10日 22:35:19 | jjlee | set | spambayes_score: 0.000454921 -> 0.00045492136 recipients: + jjlee, facundobatista, orsenthil, frispete, BitTorment |
| 2008年07月10日 22:35:18 | jjlee | set | spambayes_score: 0.000454921 -> 0.000454921 messageid: <1215729316.71.0.157184400698.issue2275@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年07月10日 22:35:15 | jjlee | link | issue2275 messages |
| 2008年07月10日 22:35:14 | jjlee | create | |