This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | amaury.forgeotdarc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, jnoller, mikemccand, pitrou, tzot |
| Date | 2008年07月09日.23:59:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | 7.710405e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1215647988.2.0.404138002795.issue874900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
A new patch: - I replaced "_active_limbo_lock.release()" by "_active_limbo_lock=_allocate_lock()" - I replaced the successive deletions in _active by a re-creation with only the current thread. There is no difference in the result, but I agree that the intent is more clear. - yes, the main thread is marked as done when the interpreter exits (hence the convoluted tests with subprocesses): in Modules/main.c, WaitForThreadShutdown() calls threading._shutdown(). Also, I hope the tests make more sense now. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年07月09日 23:59:49 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | spambayes_score: 7.71041e-06 -> 7.710405e-06 recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, mikemccand, tzot, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, jnoller |
| 2008年07月09日 23:59:48 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | spambayes_score: 7.71041e-06 -> 7.71041e-06 messageid: <1215647988.2.0.404138002795.issue874900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年07月09日 23:59:46 | amaury.forgeotdarc | link | issue874900 messages |
| 2008年07月09日 23:59:45 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |