This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | mrabarnett |
|---|---|
| Recipients | filip, gvanrossum, mkc, mrabarnett |
| Date | 2008年07月08日.16:39:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.095286526 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1215535159.15.0.376964055081.issue3262@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
There appear to be 2 opinions on this issue: 1. It's a bug, a corner case that got missed. 2. It's always been like this, so it's probably a design decision, although no-one can't point to where or when the decision was made... Looking at the code, I think it's a bug. Expected behaviour: if 'pattern' is a non-capturing regex, then re.split(pattern, text) == re.sub(pattern, MARKER, text).split(MARKER). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年07月08日 16:39:19 | mrabarnett | set | spambayes_score: 0.0952865 -> 0.095286526 recipients: + mrabarnett, gvanrossum, mkc, filip |
| 2008年07月08日 16:39:19 | mrabarnett | set | spambayes_score: 0.0952865 -> 0.0952865 messageid: <1215535159.15.0.376964055081.issue3262@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年07月08日 16:39:18 | mrabarnett | link | issue3262 messages |
| 2008年07月08日 16:39:17 | mrabarnett | create | |