This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | paulmelis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, benjamin.peterson, donmez, gvanrossum, jnoller, mark.dickinson, paulmelis, roudkerk, tebeka |
| Date | 2008年07月03日.08:14:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.017715426 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1215072879.46.0.296280487748.issue3088@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On a Linux system (FC4) with r64686 of the Py3k branch I also still get occassional hangs (with ./python -E -bb ./Lib/test/regrtest.py -v test_multiprocessing). Mostly this seems to occur with the very first test executed, i.e. before any of the "test_... " lines have been generated. The following may or may not be related. Some time ago I decided to give valgrind a try to see if it could detect anything strange going on with the multiprocessing tests, specifically using the 'helgrind' thread-debugging tool that comes with it. Valgrind reports as its first error: ==9719== Thread #1: Bug in libpthread: sem_wait succeeded on semaphore without prior sem_post ==9719== at 0x4007FFF: sem_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:1057) ==9719== by 0x4008094: sem_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:1073) ==9719== by 0x46A0087: semlock_acquire (semaphore.c:310) ==9719== by 0x808C121: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:3371) ==9719== by 0x808D0FE: PyEval_EvalCodeEx (ceval.c:2808) ==9719== by 0x808B9D0: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:3469) ==9719== by 0x808D0FE: PyEval_EvalCodeEx (ceval.c:2808) ==9719== by 0x80F4B65: function_call (funcobject.c:628) ==9719== by 0x80D1207: PyObject_Call (abstract.c:2178) ==9719== by 0x80890EC: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:3672) ==9719== by 0x808C1A9: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:3459) ==9719== by 0x808C1A9: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:3459) ==9716== Thread #1 is the program's root thread I've been hesitant to report this as the claim that libpthread is broken is pretty bold. I contacted the valgrind devs about this, see [1]. More recently, someone on the valgrind list reported problems that do seem to indicate there are broken libpthreads out there (see [2]), as this individual reports a semaphore wait not blocking where it should. Could it be that the multiprocessing tests are exposing one or more bugs in libpthread? [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.debugging.valgrind/8345 [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.debugging.valgrind/8384 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年07月03日 08:14:40 | paulmelis | set | spambayes_score: 0.0177154 -> 0.017715426 recipients: + paulmelis, gvanrossum, barry, amaury.forgeotdarc, tebeka, mark.dickinson, Rhamphoryncus, donmez, roudkerk, benjamin.peterson, jnoller |
| 2008年07月03日 08:14:39 | paulmelis | set | spambayes_score: 0.0177154 -> 0.0177154 messageid: <1215072879.46.0.296280487748.issue3088@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年07月03日 08:14:38 | paulmelis | link | issue3088 messages |
| 2008年07月03日 08:14:36 | paulmelis | create | |