This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | lisanke |
|---|---|
| Recipients | jjcogliati, lisanke, roudkerk |
| Date | 2008年06月15日.02:38:40 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.001901271 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1213497523.63.0.29499292199.issue2475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Isn't this a critical problem. The .poll() function serves as a means to check the status of the process started. When it continues to report 'None' to a process which has already terminated, it creates a false positive of a hung process. Dealing with recovery from an actual hung process is difficult enough. Having to deal with a bad detection that the process ran to completion on top of this, makes the use of subprocess difficult. Maybe I'm miss applying the .poll() function. I'm trying to detect that a process has hung, prior to calling .stdout.readlines(). The readlines() will hang my python script if the process is hung. Is there another way I should be doing this? Thanks, Mike |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年06月15日 02:38:44 | lisanke | set | spambayes_score: 0.00190127 -> 0.001901271 recipients: + lisanke, roudkerk, jjcogliati |
| 2008年06月15日 02:38:43 | lisanke | set | spambayes_score: 0.00190127 -> 0.00190127 messageid: <1213497523.63.0.29499292199.issue2475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年06月15日 02:38:42 | lisanke | link | issue2475 messages |
| 2008年06月15日 02:38:41 | lisanke | create | |