This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | Rhamphoryncus |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, jnoller |
| Date | 2008年06月13日.18:32:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.007917994 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1213381945.72.0.0851603980727.issue3100@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Well, my attempt at a patch didn't work, and yours does, so I guess I have to support yours. ;) Can you review my python-incref-from-zero patch? It verifies the invariant that you need, that once an object hits a refcount of 0 it won't get raised again. (The possibility of __del__ makes me worry, but it *looks* okay.) gcmodule.c has an inline copy of handle_callbacks. Is it possible a collection could have the same problem we're fixing here? Minor nit: you're asserting cbcalled, but you're not using the generic callback, so it's meaningless. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年06月13日 18:32:26 | Rhamphoryncus | set | spambayes_score: 0.00791799 -> 0.007917994 recipients: + Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, jnoller |
| 2008年06月13日 18:32:25 | Rhamphoryncus | set | spambayes_score: 0.00791799 -> 0.00791799 messageid: <1213381945.72.0.0851603980727.issue3100@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年06月13日 18:32:24 | Rhamphoryncus | link | issue3100 messages |
| 2008年06月13日 18:32:22 | Rhamphoryncus | create | |