This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | alexandre.vassalotti |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alexandre.vassalotti, pythonhacker |
| Date | 2008年06月05日.22:53:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.12119616 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1212706396.54.0.954019678966.issue2582@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Weird. I wonder why it succeeds to pickle to range object at all. It seems the __reduce_ex__ method emits bogus value. >>> r.__reduce_ex__(2) (<function __newobj__ at 0xb7bfdc94>, (<class 'range'>,), None, None, None) Anyway, that is easy to fix when you know the trick. So, here is the fix. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年06月05日 22:53:16 | alexandre.vassalotti | set | spambayes_score: 0.121196 -> 0.12119616 recipients: + alexandre.vassalotti, pythonhacker |
| 2008年06月05日 22:53:16 | alexandre.vassalotti | set | spambayes_score: 0.121196 -> 0.121196 messageid: <1212706396.54.0.954019678966.issue2582@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年06月05日 22:53:15 | alexandre.vassalotti | link | issue2582 messages |
| 2008年06月05日 22:53:15 | alexandre.vassalotti | create | |