This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | PiDelport, Rhamphoryncus, barry, georg.brandl, jkrukoff, ncoghlan, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2008年05月22日.22:16:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.060103003 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1211494619.55.0.820164143084.issue643841@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Correct, this isn't intended to be an all-singing, all-dancing proxy implementation - it's meant to be a simple solution for local proxies that want to change the behaviour of a few operations while leaving other operations unaffected. The proposed documentation I uploaded covers some of its limitations. However, even for those cases, ProxyMixin and/or test_typetools.TestProxyMixin can be used as a reference to make sure a custom proxy implementation correctly handles all the special method invocations that can bypass __getattribute__. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年05月22日 22:17:00 | ncoghlan | set | spambayes_score: 0.060103 -> 0.060103003 recipients: + ncoghlan, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, Rhamphoryncus, jkrukoff, PiDelport |
| 2008年05月22日 22:16:59 | ncoghlan | set | spambayes_score: 0.060103 -> 0.060103 messageid: <1211494619.55.0.820164143084.issue643841@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年05月22日 22:16:57 | ncoghlan | link | issue643841 messages |
| 2008年05月22日 22:16:56 | ncoghlan | create | |