Message 66626 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	chester
Recipients	chester
Date	2008年05月11日.13:16:14
SpamBayes Score	0.12913503
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1210511777.56.0.156447158974.issue2817@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
To create a tuple with one element, you need to do this: >>> my_tuple = (1,) # Note the trailing comma after the value 1 >>> type(my_tuple) <type 'tuple'> But if you do this >>> my_tuple = (1) >>> type(my_tuple) <type 'int'> you don't get a tuple. I thought that just putting a value inside ( ) would make a tuple. Apparently that is not the case. I hate ugly code so it would be clean if Python would convert anything put into ( ) to be a tuple, even if just one value was put in (without having to use that ugly looking comma with no value after it).

Content

To create a tuple with one element, you need to do this:
>>> my_tuple = (1,) # Note the trailing comma after the value 1
>>> type(my_tuple)
<type 'tuple'>
But if you do this
>>> my_tuple = (1)
>>> type(my_tuple)
<type 'int'>
you don't get a tuple. I thought that just putting a value inside ( )
would make a tuple. Apparently that is not the case. I hate ugly code
so it would be clean if Python would convert anything put into ( ) to
be a tuple, even if just one value was put in (without having to use
that ugly looking comma with no value after it).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008年05月11日 13:16:17	chester	set	spambayes_score: 0.129135 -> 0.12913503 recipients: + chester
2008年05月11日 13:16:17	chester	set	spambayes_score: 0.129135 -> 0.129135 messageid: <1210511777.56.0.156447158974.issue2817@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008年05月11日 13:16:15	chester	link	issue2817 messages
2008年05月11日 13:16:14	chester	create

homepage