This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | arigo, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jyasskin, lauromoura, nnorwitz, phsilva, pitrou |
| Date | 2008年04月30日.21:46:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.21652451 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1209591992.34.0.871494414841.issue2459@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Finally I had to slightly change the lnotab format to have the right tracing semantics: the change is that line number increments are now signed bytes rather than unsigned. Still, there is a small change in tracing behaviour (see test_trace.py): the for statement is traced twice in the first loop iteration, that's because the iterator object is retrieved (GET_ITER) at the beginning of the loop while the next iterator value is fetched (FOR_ITER) at the end of the loop. I don't believe this is very painful. All in all, the whole test suite now passes fine. The performance numbers are the same as before. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年04月30日 21:46:33 | pitrou | set | spambayes_score: 0.216525 -> 0.21652451 recipients: + pitrou, nnorwitz, arigo, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jyasskin, lauromoura, phsilva |
| 2008年04月30日 21:46:32 | pitrou | set | spambayes_score: 0.216525 -> 0.216525 messageid: <1209591992.34.0.871494414841.issue2459@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年04月30日 21:46:31 | pitrou | link | issue2459 messages |
| 2008年04月30日 21:46:30 | pitrou | create | |