This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | draghuram |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, draghuram, gustavo, tarek |
| Date | 2008年04月28日.14:12:02 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.014309066 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1209391925.44.0.667399603754.issue2663@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
My update with email failed so I am just copying my response here: > while working on the patch to add the same feature in rmtree, I realized > this is a non sense since the root folder itself is removed at the end > of the function when all its content is removed. Indeed. Sorry about that. > So, unless we change this behavior, which I doubt it is a good idea, it > won't be possible. I agree. But in general, it would be nice to separate file list generation and the actual operation. Something similar to shell where it resolves the pattern while the actual command itself cares only about the files passed to it. This is not necessarily a comment on this patch which I am hoping I can check it out soon. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年04月28日 14:12:06 | draghuram | set | spambayes_score: 0.0143091 -> 0.014309066 recipients: + draghuram, belopolsky, gustavo, tarek |
| 2008年04月28日 14:12:05 | draghuram | set | spambayes_score: 0.0143091 -> 0.0143091 messageid: <1209391925.44.0.667399603754.issue2663@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年04月28日 14:12:04 | draghuram | link | issue2663 messages |
| 2008年04月28日 14:12:02 | draghuram | create | |